Comparing Preventive and On-Condition Maintenance

Preventive vs. on-condition maintenance: what's the difference?


Aerofleets News14

Introduction

Both preventive and on-condition maintenance strategies have the same goal: to ensure that the equipment and machinery used in operations are functioning properly. The differences between the two approaches can be subtle, but they are important to understand when deciding how to maintain your equipment. In this article, we’ll discuss the differences between preventive and on-condition maintenance strategies, and provide guidance on how to decide which strategy is right for you.

Comparing Preventive and On-Condition Maintenance

Preventive maintenance is a strategy in which equipment is serviced and inspected at regular intervals, regardless of the condition of the equipment. This strategy is based on the idea that if equipment is serviced regularly, it will remain in working condition and be less likely to break down. On the other hand, on-condition maintenance is a strategy in which equipment is serviced and inspected only when it is needed. This strategy is based on the idea that if equipment is inspected regularly and only serviced as needed, it will remain in good condition and be less likely to fail.

Understanding the Benefits of Both Approaches

Preventive maintenance can be beneficial because it helps to reduce the likelihood of a breakdown and the associated costs. By servicing equipment regularly, it will remain in working condition and any potential issues can be identified and addressed before they become a problem. On-condition maintenance can also be beneficial because it helps to reduce unnecessary maintenance costs by only servicing equipment when it is necessary. By regularly inspecting equipment, any potential issues can be identified and addressed before they become a problem.

Deciding Which Strategy to Implement

When deciding between preventive and on-condition maintenance strategies, it is important to consider the type of equipment, the environment in which it operates, and the potential consequences of a breakdown. If the potential consequences of a breakdown are severe, then preventive maintenance may be the best option. On the other hand, if the potential consequences of a breakdown are minor, then on-condition maintenance may be the best option.

Conclusion

When deciding between preventive and on-condition maintenance strategies, it is important to consider the type of equipment, the environment in which it operates, and the potential consequences of a breakdown. Each approach has its own benefits and drawbacks, so it is important to weigh the pros and cons of each approach to determine which is the best option for your operation.


0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *